With a three-year bear market only recently ended, and with endless tales of Enron-style corporate malfeasance ringing in their ears, many small investors are returning to real estate. My nine years managing rentals in a variety of neighborhoods taught me the nuts and bolts of the business, and the Certified Property Manager (CPM) coursework acquainted me with the theory of investment property. This isn’t space enough for a full course in the business—I recently donated a shelf-full of textbooks to the library—but here’s a brief outline. I'd be happy to meet with you to discuss buying or selling investment property.
Nowadays investors in this area focus primarily on “units”: duplexes, triplexes and larger buildings. Why not invest in single-family homes? Some do, but in many price ranges the cost of a single-family home has climbed just as rents have declined [although rents have bounced back since 2005], and the resulting numbers aren’t promising. An $800,000 house bought with 25% down and the balance financed at 5.5% for 30 years has mortgage payments of about $3400 per month, yet would rent for only about $2500 per month. Add property taxes of $800 per month plus insurance and maintenance and you’re digging deep into your pocket each month to feed your so-called “income” property. That’s “negative cash-flow”: when you put money into the property each month, instead of the property putting money in your pocket. With a single-family home you could be looking at years of “running a negative”, even if rents are on their way up.
Units give you a better chance at positive cash-flow at some point in the future, but rarely right off the bat, even with a down payment of 25% or 30%. You’re best chance for positive flow (or even break-even) is units in a marginal area, but as you might expect, they come with plenty of baggage. Units in better neighborhoods carry a substantial premium that makes positive cash flow a distant goal, but they're far easier to manage.
If big mortgage payments are standing between you and positive cash flow, why not put more money down? You might do that, depending on your goals, but that blunts one of real estate’s biggest advantages: leverage, or as the get-rich-in-real-estate books call it, OPM (Other People’s Money). Investment property lets you get into the asset with less of your own money, typically 25-30% of value, than does the stock market. This dramatically multiplies your return on equity if the value of your property increases. For example, say you put down $250,000 to buy a $1,000,000 fourplex. Three years later that fourplex has appreciated $100,000 for a current value of $1.1M. Your return on equity isn’t 10% (your purchase price of $1M divided by the current value of $1.1M) but 40% (the $100k increase in your equity divided by your $250k down payment).
If leverage is that good, why not get into an investment property for less than 25% down, say 10%? As this is written you may well be able to do that, especially if you plan to live in one of the units. It all depends on how available credit is when you buy. Lenders have typically wanted a larger down payment for investment property because if an owner's cash starts running short, he or she is more likely to walk away from an investment property than from their home. Lender requirements for financing up to four units aren’t much more onerous than those for financing your home, but with five or more units they get considerably tougher. Then lenders like the property to show a healthy positive cash flow, and in an area like ours where prices are going up and rents aren't, that means a substantial down payment of perhaps 40% or so.
Another advantage of investment real estate is that you can deduct all your property-related expenses, not just the property taxes and mortgage interest your primary residence allows. That's big. Even bigger: the IRS lets you claim a “paper expense” called depreciation, a percentage of the rental’s value, each year. In other words, the IRS lets you deduct against your rental income as if your investment property was steadily declining in value, even as it may be increasing in value.
Unfortunately, that depreciation is “recaptured” (taxed, currently at 25%) if and when you sell, but that gets us to another of investment real estate’s tax advantages: the 1031 tax-deferred exchange. This is a complex procedure that if done correctly, allows you to defer the capital gains tax on the sale of investment real estate and put all your gain into another investment property of equal or greater value. Remember, you defer the tax, you don’t dodge it permanently, but that’s still better than giving Uncle Sam and California roughly 25% of your capital gain every time you sell. Click on the link below for a more detailed explanation. This is not intended as tax advice; consult a tax specialist before you buy or sell investment real estate.
Finally, how are investment properties valued? If you’re buying a single-family home, then valuation isn’t exactly rocket science: you’ll pay what owner-occupants would pay, because that's who you're competing with. Units are valued differently, yet despite the fairly sophisticated analytical tools available, I’ve found that many buyers, particularly those working without an agent, value units by the seat of their pants much as they would a single-family home.
For a more precise idea of value I suggest using a simple technique called the Gross Rent Multiplier. The best way to describe the multiplier is that it identifies the amount of money an investor will pay for each dollar of annual rent. The greater the multiplier, the more expensive the property, given the same rental income. The equation for determining market value using the multiplier is Effective Gross Income (EGI) x Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM) = Market Value. EGI = Gross Possible Income (annual rents if all units are rented at full market value) – a fixed percentage (say 3%) for vacancies and unpaid rent + miscellaneous income (coin-op laundry etc.). You or your agent should know the GRM (or “multiplier”) for the type of building you’re looking for, and for the area in which you’re looking. The rule of thumb is: the greater the number of units, the lower the multiplier. For example, you may have heard something like “duplexes sell for 14, fourplexes for 12”, but it isn't that simple. Multipliers vary by time period and area. Duplexes in the better parts of Menlo Park and Palo Alto currently sell at a multiplier that's about 60% higher than the least desirable mid-Peninsula and South Bay neighborhoods. That's because Palo Alto and Menlo Park are great places to live, and the tenants you'll get are typically easier to work with. The multiplier appropriate to your market can be calculated by using the equation Sales Price ÷ Effective Gross Income = GRM.
One big drawback to using the multiplier is when trying to value a property with units rented at substantially less than market. Typically this happens when an owner loses interest in doing the landlord thing and tells the tenants, “I won’t raise your rent if you don’t call me for maintenance”. Everyone involved feels pretty good about this, as the building falls apart around them. Low rents create artificially high multipliers, so to avoid skewing comparisons between properties, I value each as if it were rented at full market. I then adjust for deferred maintenance and updating, and mentally adjust for the likelihood of replacing the tenants who live there only because the rent is half what it is anywhere else.
The Income Capitalization method is more precise than the multiplier, since it factors in expenses that affect the landlord’s bottom line. For example, in some buildings each unit is separately metered for water, and tenants pay for what they use; in other buildings, there’s just one meter for the entire building, and the landlord pays the bill. The equation for determining market value by the “cap rate” is Net Operating Income (NOI) ÷ Capitalization Rate = Market Value, where NOI is Effective Gross Income – Operating Expenses. The cap rate can be calculated from recent sales by using the equation NOI ÷ Sales Price = Rate. The problem with using the cap rate is that the MLS entry for most small properties has expense information so incomplete it’s misleading. With larger properties this is less of a problem, since they’re typically marketed with more complete information. Unlike multipliers, the cost of an investment property goes up as the cap rate goes down.
Bear in mind that any valuation method for multi-family properties will be imprecise. For example, as this is written Sunnyvale fourplexes are selling at a GRM of anywhere from 16.45 to 22.14, even with rents adjusted. That's quite a range; in fact, it's so wide that, by itself, it's useless. That's true of any unit of measurement you'll use, whether it's GRM, cap rate, price per unit or price per square foot. Why isn't there more precision? Because besides the usual variables inherent to determining real estate value, such as size, condition and location, anyone trying to price a multi-family property is dealing with a relatively small market with a very limited number of comparables, and quite often even the comparables differ significantly from each other (this is also true of top-end residential properties). These small "samples" of comparables are inherently broad in their results, and therefore imprecise. The best way to deal with this imprecision is to compare a property to recent sales using as many criteria as possible, and expect its value to fall somewhere within these ranges.
What's the investment property market been doing lately in this area? Prices and multipliers have gone up since 1995, when the rental market suddenly came back with a bang. And they've kept going up, even as rents have come back down. Was this market affected by the late-'90s tech boom? Yes, in two ways. First, rents almost doubled between 1995 and 2000, so prices would have taken off even if multipliers had stayed flat. But multipliers went way up too, by about 50%, and prices more than doubled during that time. Then came the bust, and suddenly a rental market that had been as tight as a drum got very soft. Everything—prices, multipliers, rents—nosedived in early 2001 as renters and their good-paying jobs left the area. But a funny thing happened on the way to the total collapse of the investment market: it didn't happen. Like the single-family sales market, investment prices and multipliers bottomed in late 2001. And since then, multipliers have gone up steadily, even dramatically, dragging prices with them even while rents continue to slide. Prices are as high or higher than they were in 2000, while rents have sunk to late-1997 levels.
(It's interesting to note that new rents have declined more than the existing rents of properties that come up for sale. In other words, many tenants are still paying yesterday's higher rents. That's a tribute either to the usefulness of long lease terms or to the power of renter inertia. And it suggests that if rents continue to decline, new owners will, in effect, be paying a higher GRM down the road as they fill vacancies with tenants paying lower rents, or as they lower rents to keep tenants.) [Also note that all this talk about declining rents is historically interesting in 2007 but moot, since rents have sprung back locally, particularly for single-family homes, since late 2005.]
Bear in mind that this rosy boom market scenario applies only to the investment property market below roughly $2M as this is written in early 2005. Much like the single-family market, this number seems to be the boundary between a seller's market and a buyer's market. Why? Larger properties are bought by larger investors, and they have the capital and connections to look well beyond their back yard for investment opportunities. Our area, with its uncertain future, flagging economy, stagnant job creation and incredibly high real estate prices, must be really easy to walk away from right now. Why pay a premium for years of negative cash flow when there's low-hanging fruit in cheaper, less volatile cities like Reno and Modesto? [What's ironic about this statement in 2007 is that our economy is on the rebound, keeping prices stable, while the real estate market crashes in Reno and Modesto and other markets that apparently lived and died by subprime lending.]
Smaller properties, on the other hand, are bought by smaller investors who tend to limit themselves to local properties. What's the appeal of Bay Area real estate? Real estate loans are cheap now and the stock market is all over the map; cheaper places like Modesto are a long way away, making it tough for a small investor to stay on top of his or her property. Besides, the Bay Area's skyrocketing prices have created equity that's put money into the pocket of many a local homeowner, so local real estate is a proven product. And there's another factor: it's not just investors who buy investment property these days. Rising home prices are pushing entry-level buyers into duplexes, often with a friend or relative who'll live in the other side.
I’m happy to assist you in the purchase or marketing of a small investment property. I’ll also help you lease your property, although I invariably end up working for $5 an hour (if that much). My contract with Coldwell Banker prohibits me from managing property, or even giving the appearance of managing property, and that's okay by me.
pros and cons
· Mid-Peninsula investment property has shown healthy appreciation for much the same reason as its primary residences have: they aren’t making land here anymore.
· Recent trend out of the stock market and into real estate means a larger pool of potential buyers when you sell, assuming this trend holds. And it may, if the projections of sub-par performance in the financial markets over the near term turn out to be correct.
· The value of a duplex is easier to ascertain than the value of a stock, although neither is without risk.
· The owner of an investment property can, within limits, enhance its value. Try doing that with your shares in Juniper Networks.
· Real estate is a tangible place to put your money and watch it grow. You can see it, touch it and tell your friends to drive past it.
· Financing (see above) is relatively easy and at attractive rates, at least as of this writing.
· Leverage (see above) increases your potential return on equity.
· Tax-deferred exchanges (see above) help you build wealth more quickly.
· Residential investment property is far less volatile than commercial property. Residential doesn’t take off as dramatically, but its landings are far softer. People always need a place to live, even when there are fewer of them and they have less money than they used to.
· By and large, the law favors the landlord, at least in cities not subject to rent control. Not coincidentally, landlords have one of the most powerful lobbies in the state. Pick your battles wisely and use a professional process server, and I like your chances in Superior Court. Just think long and hard before you go there.
· Anyone can be a landlord. No training or licensing is required. Maintenance and people skills are helpful but optional. A working knowledge of landlord-tenant law is essential, as is the name of a good landlord-tenant attorney.
· While anyone can be a landlord, not everyone is cut out to be a landlord. If you’re not, you’ll pay 6-10% of the gross monthly rents to a management company, with a big effect on your bottom line. And good management companies are hard to find.
· If your investment portfolio is just one single-family home, vacancies will kill you. You’re vacancy rate is either 0% or 100%, either feast or famine.
· Turnover expenses—painting, cleaning, carpeting, window coverings, updating—make a vacancy that much more expensive. Don’t do them, or don’t do them well and (especially in a soft market) your vacants will stay vacant longer, rent for less and attract sub-par tenants.
· Units in marginal areas offer a better chance of positive cash flow but come with their own baggage. Turn your back for a second and you've lost control of the building.
· A few cities in this area have rent control. San Francisco is the most notoriously anti-landlord, but East Palo Alto and San Jose also have rent control and a few other cities have mild forms of it. Always verify any restrictions on landlords before you buy.
· A bad tenant can be a time-consuming, fairly expensive nightmare. Pick your tenants wisely, cut loose the bad ones quickly. Live by the rule “money talks and everything else walks” and you’ll dodge most of the bullets.
· Fair Housing (discrimination) is the number one issue in the apartment industry these days. A landlord who doesn’t know the latest interpretation of federal and state law, and take it seriously, can easily end up paying someone $10,000 or more to settle a discrimination complaint.
· Remember what I said about the law favoring landlords? That doesn’t necessarily apply to Small Claims Court, where security deposit disputes are resolved. The law is purposely vague when it comes to identifying proper deductions, the judge has lots of discretion and he or she has seen many a questionable deduction. You may not enjoy the experience. Document, document, document—and be able to justify your actions in court.
Interested in investing in real estate? Please contact me at email@example.com.
The chart below shows how rents and prices of local duplexes have done over the past ten years. See how prices have gone up even as rents fell, then flattened. It's important to realize that while the chart accurately tracks trends in prices, the rental income it shows for any particular period isn't necessarily the market rent for that period, because there's some lag time built into the rents. Rental income is usually generated by one-year leases, so it reflects market rent for the quarter in which the lease was signed, not necessarily the quarter in which the sale occurred. However, the chart does show the rental income that buyers were paying for, so it's more relevant than how rents were trending.
Next, note the interplay between rents and the Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM) for local duplexes. Multipliers have soared just as the rental market tanked, indicating that it's not rental income that's driving demand for duplexes. Bear in mind that the multiplier shown below is an average of many mid-Peninsula and South Bay duplex markets, so it's highly unlikely to be the right one for any particular duplex you're trying to price. Depending on your area, the multiplier could be much lower or higher.
Finally, here's the relationship between GRM and annual rental income for local fourplexes. Again, note that the GRM and rental income shown below are averages for a large area, and that the GRM and rents for any particular neighborhood are likely to be higher or lower.
East Palo Alto rent control verify with city
San Jose rent control verify with city
San Francisco rent control verify with city